channel_mute

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the three modes (mute, unmute, toggle) and specifies that null triggers toggle. However, it does not disclose side effects like audio silencing or relationship with mixer mute.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

At 7 words, it is extremely concise and front-loaded. No redundant words, though it could spare a few more words for parameter context without losing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with 2 parameters and no output schema, the description covers essential behavior but omits usage prerequisites, error conditions, and the meaning of 'index'. Minimal but functional.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description clarifies the 'muted' parameter's toggle behavior (null = toggle), which adds value beyond the schema's type annotation. But the 'index' parameter is left undefined, and schema coverage is 0%, so half the parameters lack explanation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool mutes/unmutes/toggles a channel, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'mixer_mute' that target mixer tracks. However, it could explicitly mention 'channel strip mute' for extra clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'channel_solo' or 'mixer_mute'. The description lacks usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.