plugin_set_preset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only states the basic action. It fails to disclose side effects (e.g., audio changes, error behavior on invalid index), whether the operation is reversible, or any required permissions. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at one sentence. It is front-loaded with the key action. However, the conciseness sacrifices necessary detail about parameters and behavior, making it under-informative for an agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, 2 required, no output schema, no annotations), the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain the parameter roles, default behaviors for slot and location, or what 'load preset' entails in terms of side effects or system state changes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 4 parameters (index, preset, slot, location) with zero description coverage. The tool description adds no details about what each parameter controls, the meaning of slot and location, or the valid range for index. The agent must infer entirely from names and schema defaults, which is inadequate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Load preset by numeric index', which conveys the verb (load) and resource (preset) with a qualifier (by index). Among sibling tools like plugin_next_preset and plugin_prev_preset, the purpose is distinct, though not explicitly differentiated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are given. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives such as plugin_next_preset for cycling or plugin_prev_preset, nor does it provide any context for when loading a preset by index is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.