channel_solo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only reveals toggle behavior when 'solo' is null. It does not disclose what soloing does, side effects, or return values.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise, but may be too terse for clarity. Front-loaded with action verb, but no additional structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no schema descriptions, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is very incomplete. It fails to explain the purpose of index, what solo does, or any return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains the toggle behavior of the 'solo' parameter but does not explain the 'index' parameter beyond its name. Schema has 0% description coverage, so more detail needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Solo / unsolo / toggle (None = toggle)' clearly indicates the action (solo/unsolo/toggle) and the resource is implied by the tool name 'channel_solo'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'mixer_solo' by targeting channels.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'mixer_solo' or 'playlist_solo_track'. No mention of prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.