update-notebook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description gives no behavioral details. It does not indicate whether the operation is destructive, requires confirmation (despite 'confirm' being a required parameter), or what side effects occur (e.g., overwriting existing data).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (two characters) but at the expense of all useful information. This is under-specification, not effective conciseness. The description fails to provide any value beyond the tool name itself.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (5 parameters, 0% schema coverage, no output schema, no annotations), the description is completely inadequate. It provides no context for how to use the tool correctly, leaving the agent without essential details to invoke it properly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the parameters. With five parameters (guid, name, stack, confirm, clearStack), the agent has no guidance on how they interact or what values are valid. The description does not explain the role of 'confirm' or the effect of 'clearStack'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is '改本', which is Chinese for 'update notebook', basically a tautology with the tool name. It does not specify what aspects of the notebook can be updated (e.g., name, stack), nor does it differentiate from sibling tools like create-notebook or move-notebook-to-stack.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, there is no distinction between updating a notebook's stack via this tool and using move-notebook-to-stack or remove-notebook-from-stack. No prerequisites or context are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.