clone-note
Clones an existing note, optionally with a new title and destination notebook.
Instructions
克隆笔记
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| guid | Yes | ||
| title | No | ||
| notebookGuid | No |
Clones an existing note, optionally with a new title and destination notebook.
克隆笔记
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| guid | Yes | ||
| title | No | ||
| notebookGuid | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as whether it duplicates resources, permissions, or timestamps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (one word) but underspecified; the brevity sacrifices clarity and usefulness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With three parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely insufficient for an agent to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the three parameters (guid, title, notebookGuid). Their meaning must be inferred from names alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'clone note' indicates the action and resource but lacks specificity on what cloning entails (e.g., copies content, metadata, resources) and does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'create-super-note' or 'delete-note'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives, no prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ArchChuan/yinxiang-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server