get-notebook
Retrieve a notebook by its unique GUID. Access notebook metadata from your Evernote account.
Instructions
读本
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| guid | Yes |
Retrieve a notebook by its unique GUID. Access notebook metadata from your Evernote account.
读本
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| guid | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided and description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, destructive, required permissions). Single word provides no insight.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely brief (one word) but at the cost of clarity and utility. Not concise in a helpful way; it is under-specified.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one param, no output schema) and many siblings, the description is completely inadequate. No coverage of purpose, parameters, or behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and description does not explain the required 'guid' parameter. No semantic value added.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description '读本' is vague and likely incorrect; does not indicate that the tool retrieves a notebook by GUID. No meaningful purpose stated.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs siblings like list-notebooks or update-notebook. No usage context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ArchChuan/yinxiang-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server