list-notebooks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It fails to mention any behavior such as pagination, ordering, or scope. The tool's action is completely opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but not concise—it is incomplete and uninformative. It fails to fulfill the basic requirement of describing the tool's function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no parameters, the description should provide complete context about what the tool does and returns. It provides none, leaving the agent with no understanding of the tool's purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although there are no parameters (baseline 4), the description '列本' adds no meaningful semantic information. It does not clarify what the tool outputs or any implicit parameters. The description is essentially useless for parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '列本' is ambiguous and likely truncated or garbled. It does not clearly state a verb or resource, failing to indicate that this tool lists notebooks. Compared to sibling tools with clear names like 'create-notebook' and 'get-notebook', this description is meaningless.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool or how it differs from alternatives like 'find-notes' or 'get-notebook'. The description offers no context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.