append-super-note-blocks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as whether blocks are appended to existing content, the order of operations, or any side effects. The tool's mutability and safety profile are completely unclear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (two characters), but it is not effective conciseness—it fails to convey useful information. It is under-specified rather than efficiently informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and three required parameters with zero schema coverage, the description is completely inadequate. It provides no context about return values, side effects, or expected behavior for an AI agent to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, putting the burden on the description to explain parameters. However, the description does not describe any of the three parameters (guid, blocks, confirm), leaving their purpose and constraints entirely unspecified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '追加块' is a minimal phrase in Japanese meaning 'add block' or 'append block', which vaguely hints at the tool's function but lacks English clarity and does not specify what a 'super note block' is or how this tool differs from siblings like 'replace-super-note-block'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'replace-super-note-block' or 'delete-super-note-block'. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.