delete-note

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as whether deletion is reversible, whether associated data is removed, or any authorization requirements. Given the existence of 'expunge-note' as a sibling, behavioral context is critical.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief (3 characters), which is under-specification rather than concise. It does not earn its place by adding valuable information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a deletion tool with two required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It does not explain side effects, return values, or safety considerations, which are essential for correct agent behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter names (guid, confirm). The purpose of the 'confirm' parameter (e.g., must be true to delete) is not explained, leaving the agent guessing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '删笔记' is a tautology that simply restates the tool name 'delete-note' in Chinese. It provides no specific verb or resource distinction, nor does it differentiate from sibling tools like delete-notebook, delete-note-resource, expunge-note, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as expunge-note (permanent deletion) or delete-note-resource. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.