create-super-note
Create a structured super note in Yinxiang (Evernote) with a title, notebook, and content blocks for organized note-taking.
Instructions
建超笔
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | ||
| blocks | Yes | ||
| notebookGuid | No |
Create a structured super note in Yinxiang (Evernote) with a title, notebook, and content blocks for organized note-taking.
建超笔
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | ||
| blocks | Yes | ||
| notebookGuid | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations or description disclose behavioral traits such as creation behavior, error conditions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short but critically underspecified; this is omission rather than conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 3 parameters, 2 required, no output schema, and many siblings, the description provides no useful context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage and the description adds no meaning to the parameters (title, blocks, notebookGuid).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description '建超笔' is a tautology that restates the tool name in Chinese, providing no explanation of the tool's function or distinction from siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like append-super-note-blocks or update-super-note.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ArchChuan/yinxiang-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server