update_whatsapp_account

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=false, openWorldHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the mutation/safety profile is covered. The description adds nothing beyond that — no note on whether omitted nullable fields are left unchanged, no auth/permission requirements, no side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three words with zero waste, but this is under-specification rather than conciseness — there is no substantive content to be concise about.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a five-parameter mutation tool with 0% schema coverage, no output schema, and no annotation detail beyond generic hints, the description is completely inadequate. An agent has no basis to call this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across 5 parameters, and the description supplies no meaning for any of them. An agent cannot tell from the definition alone what enable_messaging, assigned_agent_id, enable_typing_indicator, or enable_audio_message_response control or how null values are interpreted.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description restates the tool name verbatim ('Update Whatsapp Account') with no added specificity about what fields or behavior are affected. It does not distinguish this tool from siblings like update_phone_number_route, update_settings_route, or get_whatsapp_account.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of the read/list counterparts (get_whatsapp_account, list_whatsapp_accounts) that an agent would need to consult first to obtain phone_number_id.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.