get_agent_link_route

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true. The description adds no behavioral detail beyond that safety profile, such as auth requirements, link format, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded phrase with no wasted words, but it is so terse that it reads like a title restatement rather than a structured tool description. It is concise but minimally informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only one-parameter tool, the schema and annotations cover most of what is needed, but the description still omits necessary context: what link is returned, whether it is reusable, and how it differs from other agent-link-related tools. No output schema exists, so the description should do more to explain the return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and agent_id is documented as 'The id of an agent. This is returned on agent creation.' The description adds no additional parameter meaning, so the baseline of 3 applies when the schema carries the semantic load.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a clear verb + resource: 'Get Shareable Agent Link.' However, it does not distinguish this tool from many siblings such as get_agent_route, get_agent_widget_route, or get_agent_summaries_route.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives. The description only implies what the tool retrieves, without saying when an agent should select it over nearby get_agent_* tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.