update_dashboard_settings_route

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already state readOnlyHint=false, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false, and destructiveHint=false. The description only restates that an update occurs and adds nothing about permissions, side effects, or what happens to existing dashboard settings.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. However, it is under-specified for a mutation tool with an undocumented payload parameter, so its brevity is not fully appropriate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a mutation tool with one nested-array parameter, zero schema descriptions, and no output schema, the definition is incomplete. An agent cannot determine what 'charts' should contain or how the update behaves beyond the high-level operation name.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the single parameter 'charts' is undocumented in both the schema and the description. The description never mentions charts, their format, or what updating them means, so it fails to compensate for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb and resource: update Convai Dashboard Settings. It distinguishes the operation from the sibling read tool get_dashboard_settings_route, but does not differentiate it from the broader update_settings_route or clarify what dashboard settings are included.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or the sibling update_settings_route, leaving the agent to infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.