gerent365_update_business

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that all fields are optional and only provided ones are sent ('solo se envían los provistos'), which is a useful partial-update behavior beyond the schema. However, with no annotations, it does not address permissions, side effects, or response format, leaving some behavioral ambiguity for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that fully explains the core behavior without unnecessary words. Efficient and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 9 parameters including a nested settings object, no output schema, and no annotations. The description provides the key behavior (partial update) and the schema covers parameters, but it lacks usage context, error handling, and any mention of permissions or return values. Adequate for a simple update, but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage, so all 9 parameters are described individually. The description adds no parameter-specific semantics beyond noting optionality, which is already reflected in required:0. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates business information ('Actualiza la información del negocio'), using a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling update_* tools by targeting the business entity. While it doesn't enumerate specific fields, the name and schema clarify scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or relationship to other update tools (e.g., update_customer, update_employee). The context signals show 51 sibling tools, but the description provides no selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.