gerent365_create_product

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden for behavioral transparency. It only states the action 'creates' without disclosing side effects, required prior conditions (e.g., category must exist), validation rules, or the response format. For a mutation tool, this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear sentence that is front-loaded with the action 'Crea'. It is concise with no filler, but it is perhaps too sparse given the tool's complexity, which slightly lowers the score from a perfect 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 11 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations. The description provides minimal context, omitting return value, error behavior, or any operational nuance. It is insufficient for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 64%, leaving several parameters undocumented. The description's mention of 'precio, categoría e impuestos' adds little beyond the schema's existing parameter descriptions, and it does not help clarify undocumented parameters like stock, minStock, or trackStock. It fails to compensate for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Crea un nuevo producto' (Create a new product), specifying the verb and resource with precision. It mentions price, category, and taxes, but does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like list_products or create_product_category, so it loses a point for lack of explicit differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. It implies use for creating products but lacks any contextual guidance, earning a low score.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.