gerent365_get_schedule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic function and parameter format, but does not disclose any behavioral aspects like authentication requirements, what the response contains, or whether it is a safe read-only operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two short, front-loaded sentences in Spanish. Every word adds value—the action, the resource, and the parameter format—with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (one parameter, no output schema, no nested objects), the description is minimally sufficient but lacks detail on the return value and whether the schedule covers all employees. This could be important for an agent deciding if this tool meets a user request.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already describes weekStart as 'Inicio de la semana (YYYY-MM-DD)'. The description adds the note that weekStart is typically Monday, which provides slight contextual value beyond the schema but does not meaningfully expand parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Obtiene') and resource ('el horario de una semana'), clearly indicating a read operation for a weekly schedule. It distinguishes from sibling tools like gerent365_assign_shift and gerent365_copy_week because it explicitly focuses on retrieval of a schedule.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as gerent365_get_attendance or gerent365_assign_shift. It only states what the tool does, with no mention of when it is appropriate or when to prefer other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.