gerent365_create_table

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'creates a new table' without revealing side effects, permission requirements, uniqueness constraints on the 'number' field, or any validation behavior. This is minimal for a write operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the action and included fields. Every word earns its place, with no fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create-table tool with no output schema and modest parameter complexity, the description is adequate but leaves gaps: it doesn't explain when to use it, any side effects, or required permissions. Given the lack of annotations and minimal guidance, it is minimally viable but not contextually rich.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for 4 of 5 parameters (80% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The description merely repeats the field names (number, capacity, location) without adding significant meaning or clarifying edge cases, but it does align with the schema and adds a hint about the 'location' parameter despite it not being required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Crea una nueva mesa') and the key attributes (número, capacidad, ubicación), distinguishing it from sibling tools like gerent365_list_tables (which lists) and gerent365_create_reservation (which creates reservations). The verb and resource are specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any mention of prerequisites or contexts to avoid. The description simply states what it does, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name and sibling context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.