gerent365_logout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses the main behavior (closing the session) and an additional side effect (clearing cookies), but does not discuss other implications like token invalidation, error cases, or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource, no filler. It earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple zero-param logout tool, the description is adequate but lacks details on preconditions or side effects beyond cookies. It doesn't mention return value, but that is often empty for such actions. Given no annotations, a few more details would make it complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters, so schema coverage is 100% and there are no parameter semantics to explain. The baseline score of 4 is appropriate since the description appropriately avoids any param details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool closes the current Gerent365 session and cleans cookies, with a specific verb and resource. It is unambiguous and distinguishes from sibling tools like login.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by stating its action, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use it vs alternatives or any exclusions. Users must infer that it's for ending a session.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.