set_domain_ua_blackwhitelist

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

无注释信息，描述仅重复名称。未披露设置操作是否覆盖现有规则、类型为off时的行为、是否需要特定权限或速率限制等关键行为特征。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述极为简洁（一个短语），但未提供额外价值，几乎与名称重复。虽无冗余，但缺乏必要细节，不算是高效的简洁。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

工具涉及3个参数且无输出模式或无注释，描述仅说明功能，未解释参数交互（如value仅当type非off时需提供）、操作效果或错误处理，信息不完整。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

输入模式中所有参数均有描述，覆盖率达100%。描述未增加超出模式的信息，但模式本身已提供足够的参数含义，因此基线为3。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述明确指定了操作为'设置域名 UA 黑白名单'，动词（设置）和资源（域名UA黑白名单）清晰，与查询类工具（query_domain_ua_blackwhitelist）及其他设置类工具（set_domain_*）明确区分。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

未提供任何关于何时使用此工具、何时不使用或替代方案的指导。例如，未说明应先查询当前状态或与其他黑白名单工具的区别。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.