set_domain_http3
Configure HTTP/3 protocol support for a CDN domain, enabling or disabling it to enhance connection performance.
Instructions
设置域名 HTTP/3
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | Yes | 域名 | |
| enable | Yes | HTTP/3:on=开启,off=关闭 |
Configure HTTP/3 protocol support for a CDN domain, enabling or disabling it to enhance connection performance.
设置域名 HTTP/3
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | Yes | 域名 | |
| enable | Yes | HTTP/3:on=开启,off=关闭 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only says 'set' but does not disclose behavioral traits such as effects on existing settings, required permissions, or reversibility.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise, containing only the essential information. It is front-loaded, but lacks structural elements beyond a single phrase.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It omits context such as what enabling HTTP/3 means or expected behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes both parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's own descriptions, resulting in a baseline score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it sets domain HTTP/3, with a verb and resource. It distinguishes from query siblings like 'query_domain_http3'. However, it does not explain what HTTP/3 setting entails.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when to use or not use, or related query tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yingcaihuang/racorecloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server