query_domain_force_https
Checks whether a domain has forced HTTPS redirection enabled, allowing you to verify HTTPS enforcement settings.
Instructions
查询域名强制 HTTPS 跳转设置
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | Yes | 域名 |
Checks whether a domain has forced HTTPS redirection enabled, allowing you to verify HTTPS enforcement settings.
查询域名强制 HTTPS 跳转设置
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | Yes | 域名 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It implies a read-only query but does not explicitly state safety or lack of side effects. For a simple query, this is adequate but not enhanced.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no filler. Front-loaded with purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. Description suffices for the intended operation, though it could mention what is returned (settings).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter 'domain' described as '域名'. Description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description '查询域名强制 HTTPS 跳转设置' clearly states verb (query) and resource (domain force HTTPS redirect settings). Among siblings, it is specifically differentiated from 'set_domain_force_https' and other query tools by focusing on this exact setting.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'query_domain_https' or 'set_domain_force_https'. The description does not provide context for appropriate use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yingcaihuang/racorecloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server