get_log_download_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

没有提供注释，描述仅说明'获取CDN日志下载列表'，未披露行为特征如只读性、权限要求或返回格式。对于没有任何注释的工具，描述应承担更多责任。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述仅一句话，简洁明了，无冗余。但信息量不足，并非仅仅是简洁。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

工具无输出模式，描述未说明返回值的结构或内容。对于列表工具，应描述列表项内容（如下载链接、大小、时间）。当前描述不完整。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

输入模式覆盖100%参数，描述未增加参数含义。基线3分合适，因为模式已充分记录参数。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述清楚地表明工具是获取CDN日志下载列表，动词+资源明确。与兄弟工具相比，该工具功能独特，没有其他工具专门处理日志下载列表。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述没有提供何时或何时不使用该工具的指导，也没有提及替代方案。缺乏使用上下文。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.