quick_create_domain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Reveals automatic certificate matching/application and SSL enabling, which is positive. Lacks disclosure of side effects (e.g., overwriting existing config, permission needs, failure handling). No annotations to supplement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with purpose, no redundant words. Efficiently conveys key functionality.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a quick-create tool with 4 simple params and no output schema, description adequately covers purpose and key inputs. Could mention what happens on duplicate or error, but not essential given simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters. Description adds value by highlighting domain and origin as minimal inputs and indicating default 'type' is 'oversea'. Does not mention 'note' parameter but overall useful beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it creates a CDN acceleration domain quickly with minimal input (domain and origin), automatically handling certificate/SSL. Distinguishes from sibling 'create_domain' by emphasizing automation and simplicity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use when wanting quick setup with automatic SSL, contrasting with manual processes. However, no explicit when-not-to-use or comparison to siblings like 'apply_aws_certificate' or 'set_domain_https'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.