get_workorder_messages
Retrieve all communication messages and replies for a CDN work order by providing its ID.
Instructions
获取工单沟通记录
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 工单 ID |
Retrieve all communication messages and replies for a CDN work order by providing its ID.
获取工单沟通记录
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 工单 ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only states 'get' without mentioning pagination, ordering, side effects, or permissions. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is one phrase with no unnecessary words. Very concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and one parameter, the description should explain what is returned (e.g., list of messages) or prerequisites. It is incomplete for an agent to fully understand the tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema's description. Baseline 3 applies as the schema already documents the parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves communication records for a work order. It distinguishes from siblings like send_workorder_message and get_workorder_list, but fails to specify scope or format.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied as retrieving work order messages, but no guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives like send_workorder_message or get_workorder_list.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yingcaihuang/racorecloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server