WAzion MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It includes the '[mutation]' tag indicating state changes and 'temporalmente' suggesting reversibility, but omits details about side effects (e.g., what happens to messages currently being sent), required permissions, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise two-part structure. The em-dash separates the action label from the detailed description efficiently. Every word earns its place: 'temporalmente' establishes reversibility, 'en curso' establishes eligibility constraints, and '[mutation]' flags the operation type.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter state-change tool with no output schema, the description adequately covers the essential behavioral context (temporary pause of active campaigns). Minor gap in not explicitly referencing resume_campaign as the logical counterpart operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage (campaign_id is fully documented). The description does not add parameter-specific guidance beyond the schema, which is acceptable given the high schema coverage and single obvious parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action (pausa/pauses) and target resource (campana de marketing masivo en curso/ongoing mass marketing campaign). The inclusion of 'temporalmente' (temporarily) and 'en curso' (ongoing) effectively distinguishes this from permanent termination tools like cancel_campaign or delete_campaign.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While 'temporalmente' implies this is for temporary suspension rather than permanent cancellation, the description lacks explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives like cancel_campaign, archive_campaign, or resume_campaign. No explicit prerequisites or conditions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.