WAzion MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It correctly clarifies that the tool returns a URL rather than the actual file content, which is crucial behavioral information. However, it omits details about URL expiration, authentication requirements, or whether the URL is temporary/presigned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately brief and front-loaded with the action and resource. However, the inclusion of '[query]' at the end appears to be template leakage or metadata noise, preventing a higher score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple single-parameter input and lack of output schema, the description adequately covers the essential behavior (returning a download URL). It could be improved by describing the output format or URL characteristics, but it meets minimum viability for this complexity level.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (the 'id' parameter is fully described in the schema as 'ID del archivo de conocimiento'). The description does not add additional semantic context beyond the schema, meeting the baseline expectation for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it 'Obtiene la URL de descarga' (gets the download URL) for a knowledge base file, distinguishing it from sibling tools like download_conversation_file by specifying 'base de conocimiento'. However, the trailing '[query]' artifact slightly muddies the clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_knowledge_files or create_knowledge_file. No prerequisites (e.g., needing the file ID first) or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.