update-model-version
Update the description of a model version by specifying the model name and version.
Instructions
Update a model version's description
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| version | Yes | ||
| description | No |
Update the description of a model version by specifying the model name and version.
Update a model version's description
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| version | Yes | ||
| description | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate mutation (readOnlyHint=false) and open world (openWorldHint=true). The description adds no behavioral context beyond this, such as authorization requirements, side effects, or response details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, and clear. Could include more detail without losing conciseness, but it is efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple tool, but lacks information about return value, errors, or validation (e.g., version must exist). With no output schema, more context would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description only mentions the 'description' parameter implicitly, but does not clarify what 'name' and 'version' refer to (e.g., model name? version string?). No compensation for the coverage gap.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and resource 'a model version's description', making the purpose specific. However, it does not differentiate from siblings like create-model-version or set-model-version-tag.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or context about model version state required. Siblings like transition-model-version-stage or set-model-version-tag are not mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/mlflow-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server