get-registered-model
Retrieve a registered MLflow model's metadata and details by providing the model name.
Instructions
Get a registered model by name
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Registered model name |
Retrieve a registered MLflow model's metadata and details by providing the model name.
Get a registered model by name
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Registered model name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description does not state behavioral traits such as read-only nature, error handling, or required permissions. For a simple get operation, more context would be helpful.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, clear sentence with no extraneous words. Perfectly concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-name operation, the description is adequate. However, missing output schema and behavioral details, but these are not strictly necessary for basic understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 100% description coverage for the single parameter 'name'. Description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly indicates action (get) and resource (registered model) with identifier (by name). Distinguishes from siblings like search-registered-models implicitly, but does not explicitly differentiate from other get tools for different resources.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like search-registered-models or list-registered-models. No exclusion criteria or context about prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/mlflow-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server