delete-webhook
Delete a webhook by providing its unique ID. Removes the specified webhook from the system.
Instructions
Delete a webhook by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Webhook ID to delete |
Delete a webhook by providing its unique ID. Removes the specified webhook from the system.
Delete a webhook by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Webhook ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, so the description doesn't need to reiterate destruction. However, it adds no further context about irreversibility, required permissions, or effects on dependent resources. With annotations present, this is acceptable but not exceptional.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, efficient sentence that front-loads the action and resource. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation with one parameter and annotations indicating destructiveness, the description is complete enough. It could mention irreversibility, but the destructive hint covers that implicitly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the description 'by ID' matches the schema's 'Webhook ID to delete'. No additional semantic value is provided beyond the schema, which is adequate for a single-parameter tool.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'delete' on the resource 'webhook' and specifies the required identifier ('by ID'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'create-webhook' or 'update-webhook'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, no mention of prerequisites for deletion, consequences, or when not to delete (e.g., if the webhook is still in use).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/mlflow-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server