delete-model-version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states 'delete' with no details on side effects, irreversibility, or required permissions. Since no annotations are present, the description should have disclosed behavioral traits but failed to do so.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but arguably too brief. It front-loads the main action but lacks essential structuring or additional details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 params, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It does not mention return values, confirmation, or impact on related resources, leaving the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage for the two parameters (name, version), and the description adds no explanation of their meaning or format. The agent cannot infer what 'name' or 'version' refer to without additional context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete a specific model version' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like create-model-version or update-model-version.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as delete-logged-model or other deletion tools. The description lacks context on prerequisites or conditions for deletion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.