delete-logged-model-tag
Delete a tag from a logged model by specifying the model ID and tag key to remove.
Instructions
Delete a tag from a LoggedModel
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| modelId | Yes | ||
| key | Yes | Tag key to delete |
Delete a tag from a logged model by specifying the model ID and tag key to remove.
Delete a tag from a LoggedModel
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| modelId | Yes | ||
| key | Yes | Tag key to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false. The description adds no further behavioral context like idempotency, error handling, or side effects beyond stating the deletion action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence but lacks structure and additional context that would make it more informative without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and a destructive action, the description should note return values, prerequisites, or side effects, but it only states the basic operation, leaving gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 50% (only 'key' has a description). The description does not add meaning to 'modelId' or clarify format/lookup requirements, leaving ambiguity for the agent.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a tag from a LoggedModel' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from siblings like 'delete-logged-model' or 'delete-run-tag'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'set-logged-model-tags' or other delete tools. Context on prerequisites or comparison is missing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/us-all/mlflow-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server