Настройки уведомлений

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and open-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds no further behavioral context such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or output format, leaving it with minimal value beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no wasted words, but it lacks a clear verb and front-loaded action, making it terse to the point of under-specification. Still, it is efficient for a simple read tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only tool with no output schema, the description states the data returned (catalog of types and delivery flags), which is reasonably complete. However, it does not clarify the output format or distinguish it from siblings like notifications_summary, so some gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has zero parameters, so the schema cannot be enriched; baseline for zero params is 4. The description does not discuss any parameters, which is appropriate given none exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description is a noun phrase ('Full catalog of types and current delivery flags') that names the returned data but never states an action verb or purpose, leaving it unclear whether the tool retrieves, lists, or manages settings. It is more specific than the title but still vague about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no when-to-use guidance, no exclusions, and does not mention the sibling notifications_settings_save or any alternative. An agent receives no routing information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.