operbots-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to operbots-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets coding agents like Cursor and Claude manage neural employees (AI assistants) across channels such as Telegram, WhatsApp, and web widgets. It provides tools for surveys, tasks, worker card management, Telegram bot control, and booking CRM.59MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents full access to a personal Telegram account via MTProto, enabling chat reading, history search, messaging, media handling, and automations.791MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceThis MCP server enables AI assistants to interact with a BT Panel server through natural language, allowing users to query logs, manage websites, and monitor system status without manual panel login.929 npm11MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with Telegram bots and channels using the Telegraf library. It allows AI agents to send messages, manage channels, forward content, and intelligently respond to Telegram conversations.552 npm8-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server with persistent memory, voice understanding, multi-thread orchestration, and remote control via Telegram for AI assistants.2,299 npm5MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA specialized MCP server that allows AI coding assistants to send direct messages via your personal Telegram account.1-
TDQS
Scored across 143 tools
With 143 tools there are several overlapping pairs (e.g., bots_delete vs bots_detach, bots_save vs bots_control, dialogs_release vs dialogs_update mode=bot, cases_delete vs cases_save archived=true). Descriptions are detailed enough to resolve most overlaps, but the sheer breadth imposes high selection cost on an agent.
Most tools follow a predictable resource_action pattern (cases_list, bots_get, flows_save), which is readable and largely consistent. Deviations include singular prefixes (case_transfer), noun_noun names (account_security), bare names (whoami), and mixed plural/singular sub-resource forms (requests_tasks_list vs requests_task_complete).
143 tools is an extreme count for any MCP server, far beyond the 3-15 range that supports efficient tool selection. Even for a broad platform, this volume creates an unwieldy surface that likely burdens context and routing.
The toolset comprehensively covers the platform's domains: cases, bots, flows, dialogs, requests, counterparties, knowledge bases, broadcasts, market, extensions, AI providers, notifications, account/session management, and audit. CRUD and lifecycle operations are present across nearly all resources, with few obvious dead ends.