Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to operbots-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets coding agents like Cursor and Claude manage neural employees (AI assistants) across channels such as Telegram, WhatsApp, and web widgets. It provides tools for surveys, tasks, worker card management, Telegram bot control, and booking CRM.
      59
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents full access to a personal Telegram account via MTProto, enabling chat reading, history search, messaging, media handling, and automations.
      79
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables AI assistants to interact with a BT Panel server through natural language, allowing users to query logs, manage websites, and monitor system status without manual panel login.
      9
      29 npm
      11
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for interacting with Telegram bots and channels using the Telegraf library. It allows AI agents to send messages, manage channels, forward content, and intelligently respond to Telegram conversations.
      5
      52 npm
      8
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 143 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    With 143 tools there are several overlapping pairs (e.g., bots_delete vs bots_detach, bots_save vs bots_control, dialogs_release vs dialogs_update mode=bot, cases_delete vs cases_save archived=true). Descriptions are detailed enough to resolve most overlaps, but the sheer breadth imposes high selection cost on an agent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a predictable resource_action pattern (cases_list, bots_get, flows_save), which is readable and largely consistent. Deviations include singular prefixes (case_transfer), noun_noun names (account_security), bare names (whoami), and mixed plural/singular sub-resource forms (requests_tasks_list vs requests_task_complete).

    Tool Count1/5

    143 tools is an extreme count for any MCP server, far beyond the 3-15 range that supports efficient tool selection. Even for a broad platform, this volume creates an unwieldy surface that likely burdens context and routing.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset comprehensively covers the platform's domains: cases, bots, flows, dialogs, requests, counterparties, knowledge bases, broadcasts, market, extensions, AI providers, notifications, account/session management, and audit. CRUD and lifecycle operations are present across nearly all resources, with few obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues