Skip to main content
Glama

Подключения к ИИ-сервисам

ai_list
Read-onlyIdempotent

List AI services linked to a case, including models and bot usage. Shows only key suffixes for security.

Instructions

Какие ИИ-сервисы подключены к делу, с какими моделями и сколько ботов их используют. Ключи не показываются — только последние символы.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
caseNoДело: название или идентификатор. Если не указать, берётся дело по умолчанию, иначе последнее открытое в панели.
providerNoИдентификатор подключения для полной карточки.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.2.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / provider
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Идентификатор подключения для полной карточки.",
      +  "format": "uuid",
      +  "pattern": "^([0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}-[1-8][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[89abAB][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[0-9a-fA-F]{12}|00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000|ffffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff)$",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observedv0.1.1

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true). The description adds meaningful behavioral context by disclosing that keys are masked and only the last characters are shown, which is beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two well-formed sentences, purpose front-loaded, with zero wasted words. The key-masking note is placed as a secondary sentence, keeping the core purpose clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with no output schema, the description adequately covers what is returned (services, models, bot usage counts, masked keys). It does not explain how the provider parameter changes output to a full card, but that detail is present in the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both the case and provider parameters are already documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, which is the baseline when the schema fully covers them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a clear list operation over AI service connections, including the models and bot counts returned. It is specific and distinguishable from ai_save/ai_delete/ai_test, but does not explicitly name a sibling to differentiate from, which keeps it at 4 rather than 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states what the tool returns but gives no when-to-use guidance, no conditions or alternatives, and no exclusions. An agent can infer it is for viewing connected AI services, but no explicit usage context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools