Skip to main content
Glama

linear_updateComment

Idempotent

Update an existing comment on a Linear issue, with options for quoted text and subscriber management.

Instructions

Update an existing comment

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesID of the comment to update
bodyNoUpdated comment body
quotedTextNoOptional quoted text for inline comments
subscriberIdsNoOptional subscriber IDs
resolvingUserIdNoOptional resolving user ID
resolvingCommentIdNoOptional resolving comment ID
doNotSubscribeToIssueNoPrevent auto subscription on update

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNo
urlNo
bodyNo
userNo
issueNo
parentNo
editedAtNo
createdAtNo
updatedAtNo
quotedTextNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate it is an idempotent, non-destructive mutation, but the description adds no behavioral context (e.g., effect on notifications, resolving threads). It only repeats the verb 'Update' from the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at four words, but it could include one more sentence to provide context without being verbose. It is front-loaded and earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema and annotations, the description omits key context like required permissions, side effects, and the purpose of optional parameters (e.g., resolvingUserId). Insufficient for a 7-parameter mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%; the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Update an existing comment' clearly specifies the verb (update) and resource (comment), distinguishing it from create, delete, and get comment tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to update vs. create a comment, or any prerequisites like comment ownership.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server