Linear
Related Servers
Alternatives to Linear
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with Linear's API, enabling users to manage issues, projects, teams, and comments through natural language. It supports creating, updating, deleting, and searching issues, as well as project and team management.252,020 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables interaction with Linear.app's API for issue tracking, project management, and workflow automation. It allows users to create, update, and search issues, manage cycles and labels, and perform team operations through natural language.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for the Linear API, enabling AI assistants to list, inspect, and create issues, as well as manage teams and projects through controlled tools.313 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Linear project management systems, allowing users to create, update, and manage issues, projects, teams, and comments through natural language.41,337 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCustom MCP server for Linear that enables managing issues, projects, and workspaces through natural language, backed by raw GraphQL.82 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Linear that enables creating, searching, updating, and commenting on issues, as well as accessing issues, teams, and user data. Integrates with Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 198 tools
Most tools pair a distinct entity with an action, but the 198-tool surface contains many overlapping list/search variants such as getIssues, searchIssues, getProjectIssues, and getCycleIssues. Archive/delete/remove/unarchive distinctions also require careful reading, so selection errors remain likely despite helpful descriptions.
Names consistently use the linear_ prefix followed by camelCase verb+entity patterns, with predictable get/create/update/archive/delete forms. Minor deviations such as getViewer and getOrganization versus plural list names like getUsers are readable but not perfectly uniform.
198 tools is far beyond a well-scoped MCP server and creates an extreme selection and maintenance burden. Even for a large domain like Linear, the surface should be split, tiered, or reduced to core workflows.
Coverage is extensive across issues, projects, cycles, initiatives, documents, releases, customers, webhooks, OAuth, notifications, and admin surfaces. However, there are notable gaps such as no unarchiveIssue/deleteIssue, limited label CRUD, no obvious listIssueRelations, and several resources supporting archive but not full delete/unarchive lifecycle.