Skip to main content
Glama

linear_createWebhook

Set up a webhook to receive Linear events (e.g., issue updates) at a specified URL, enabling automated integrations and workflows.

Instructions

Create a webhook for integration events

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYes
labelNo
secretNo
teamIdNo
enabledNo
resourceTypesYes
allPublicTeamsNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNo
urlNo
teamNo
labelNo
creatorNo
enabledNo
createdAtNo
updatedAtNo
archivedAtNo
resourceTypesNo
allPublicTeamsNo
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a mutation (readOnlyHint=false) and not destructive. The description adds no further behavioral context beyond 'create'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence is efficient, but it lacks necessary detail for a tool with 7 parameters, making it underspecified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (7 parameters, 2 required) and zero schema coverage, the description is far from complete. It does not explain what 'integration events' are or what valid resourceTypes are, relying entirely on the output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description provides no explanation of any of the 7 parameters (e.g., url, resourceTypes, secret). The description adds zero meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('create') and the resource ('webhook'), with a vague scope ('for integration events'). However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like updateWebhook or deleteWebhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., updateWebhook, deleteWebhook). No prerequisites or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server