Skip to main content
Glama

linear_createRelease

Create a new release in a release pipeline by specifying pipeline ID and name, with optional version, description, commit SHA, stage, and dates.

Instructions

Create a new release in a release pipeline

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pipelineIdYesThe ID of the release pipeline this release belongs to
nameYesThe name of the release
versionNoThe version identifier for the release
descriptionNoThe release description in markdown or plain text
commitShaNoThe Git commit SHA associated with the release
stageIdNoOptional stage ID for the release
startDateNoOptional estimated start date in YYYY-MM-DD format
targetDateNoOptional estimated completion date in YYYY-MM-DD format
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, and the description provides minimal behavioral information. It does not disclose side effects, error conditions, return values, or required permissions, leaving the agent without critical insights.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundant information. Conciseness is well-maintained, though the brevity sacrifices some context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 8 parameters and no annotations or output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, error handling, or integration with the release pipeline lifecycle.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for each parameter. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create', resource 'release', and context 'in a release pipeline'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like linear_archiveRelease or linear_updateRelease, but could be more specific about the exact entity being created.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as linear_createReleasePipeline or linear_createReleaseStage. No prerequisites (e.g., pipeline existence) or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server