linear_archiveMilestone
Archive a project milestone by its ID to keep your milestone list focused on active items.
Instructions
Archive a project milestone
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ID of the milestone to archive |
Archive a project milestone by its ID to keep your milestone list focused on active items.
Archive a project milestone
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ID of the milestone to archive |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description only states 'Archive' but does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether it can be undone, impact on related items). The description carries full burden and falls short.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The single-sentence description is concise with no filler. However, lacks helpful detail that would not harm conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple archive action, description should mention that archiving hides the milestone but can be unarchived. No output schema, so return behavior is unspecified. Incomplete for effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with description for 'id'. Tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Archive' and resource 'project milestone', clearly distinguishing it from sibling archive tools like archiveProject or archiveIssue.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., updateMilestone, deleteMilestone). The description does not mention prerequisites or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server