Uncomplete Basecamp Todo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not contradict annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true). It adds the behavioral detail of undoing completion, but annotations already cover idempotency and non-destructiveness, so the description provides only marginal additional insight.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence of 8 words with zero redundancy. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter, no output schema, and rich annotations, the description is adequate but lacks mention of preconditions (e.g., todo must be currently completed) or error scenarios. It could be slightly more informative.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'todo_id' is fully described in the schema with base description. The tool description adds no further semantics, such as where to obtain the id or any constraints, which is acceptable given 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Mark a todo as incomplete (undo completion).' It uses a specific verb and resource, and it naturally distinguishes itself from the sibling 'basecamp_complete_todo' by being the inverse operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage via 'undo completion,' but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like 'basecamp_complete_todo' or provide any context on prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.