List Basecamp Comments

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the tool as read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, and open-world. The description adds behavioral context by stating it 'works universally on all recording types', confirming wide applicability. No contradictions. The added scope detail complements the annotations well.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two short, front-loaded sentences with no wasted words. It immediately conveys the tool's purpose and scope without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list tool with clear annotations and full schema coverage, the description is mostly adequate. However, the lack of usage guidelines or differentiation from sibling tools leaves a gap. Given the context of many sibling list tools, more guidance would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with clear descriptions for both parameters ('Basecamp resource identifier' and 'ID of the resource'). The description does not add further parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides. Since the schema is sufficient, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List comments', the resource (comments), and the scope ('on any Basecamp resource'). It also emphasizes universality across all recording types. This effectively distinguishes it from sibling list tools that target specific resource types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the many sibling list tools (e.g., basecamp_list_messages, basecamp_list_todos). The description does not mention alternatives or when it should not be used. More explicit context would help the agent choose correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.