Skip to main content
Glama

Create Basecamp Document

basecamp_create_document

Create a document in a Basecamp vault with custom title and HTML content, choosing between active or draft status.

Instructions

Create a new document in a vault.

HTML rules for content:

  • Allowed tags: div, span, h1, br, strong, em, strike, a (with an href attribute), pre, ol, ul, li, blockquote, bc-attachment (with sgid attribute).

  • Try to be semantic despite the limitations of tags. Use double to create paragraph spacing

  • To mention people:

  • To consume less tokens, existing tags can be rewritten by dropping any attributes/inner content and just leave the "sgid" and "caption" attributes, without loosing any information

  • You can highlight parts of the content in this format ... valid colors are:

    • red: 255, 229, 229

    • yellow: 250, 247, 133

    • green: 228, 248, 226

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bucket_idYesProject/bucket ID
vault_idYesVault ID to create the document in
titleYesDocument title
contentYesHTML document content
statusNoDocument statusactive
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate write behavior (readOnlyHint=false). Description adds HTML formatting rules but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or what happens upon creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Main purpose is front-loaded. HTML rules are lengthy but necessary for correct content formatting. Could be slightly more concise by separating rules into a bullet list.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the main action and content rules but does not mention return value (e.g., the created document object). Lacks completeness for a create operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (baseline 3). Description provides detailed HTML rules for the content parameter, adding meaning beyond the schema. Other parameters only restate schema info.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new document in a vault,' specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like basecamp_get_document and basecamp_update_document.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among many creation tools, no prerequisites or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/stefanoverna/basecamp-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server