Update Basecamp Comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains how different parameters (content, content_append, content_prepend, search_replace) modify the comment, and specifies that content replaces the entire HTML while others are partial. This adds behavioral context beyond annotations, which only show readOnlyHint=false. No annotation contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, but the extensive HTML rules list makes it lengthy. While structured, it could be more concise by condensing the formatting guidelines.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no output schema, the description adequately covers how to use the parameters and content formatting. However, it does not mention return values, permissions, or error conditions, leaving some gaps in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides detailed descriptions for all 6 parameters (83% coverage), so the description adds limited new semantic meaning. The HTML rules provide context for content formatting but don't explain parameter usage beyond what the schema already covers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update a comment', which is a specific verb-resource combination. It distinguishes from sibling tools like basecamp_create_comment by using 'Update', making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises using partial content operations to save tokens, and provides detailed HTML rules for content formatting. However, it does not explicitly state when to use the tool versus creating a new comment, though the tool name implies it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.