Skip to main content
Glama

Create Basecamp Todo List

basecamp_create_todolist

Create a new todo list inside a Basecamp todo set. Provide the todoset_id, list name, and optional HTML description to organize project tasks.

Instructions

Create a new todo list in a todo set. Get the todoset_id from the project dock (basecamp_get_project).

HTML rules for content:

  • Allowed tags: p, span, h2, h3, h4, br, strong, em, strike, code, a (with href attribute), pre, ol, ul, li, blockquote, mark, figure, figcaption, table, tbody, tr, th, td, div, bc-attachment.

  • Wrap every paragraph in ..., and put between one paragraph and the next. Both parts are necessary: newlines and blank lines in your HTML are discarded, and Basecamp shows no space around a on its own, so two paragraphs with nothing between them are shown as one block of text. Do not rely on line breaks in your HTML to separate paragraphs.

  • Headings: use , , as appropriate.

  • Inline code: text. Preformatted blocks: text.

  • Ordered lists: .... Unordered: ....

  • Tables: Heading...Cell...

  • To mention a person: . Put the tag where the name must show in the text, for example "Thanks for the fix". The person gets a notification. If the ID is not a person, the tool returns an error and writes nothing. Get person IDs from basecamp_list_people, or from the people in other responses (assignees, creators).

  • Single image:

  • Image gallery: wrap multiple in a .

  • A bc-attachment needs an attachable_sgid. For a file that is already in Basecamp, take the sgid from the HTML content of the message, comment or card that shows it, or use basecamp_list_recordings. For a file that is not in Basecamp yet, such as an image at an external URL or a screenshot on disk, upload it with basecamp_create_attachment and use the sgid that it returns. There is no tag, so an external image URL can never be embedded directly: upload it, or accept that it stays a plain link.

  • Basecamp auto-enriches bc-attachment tags after saving (adds url, href, filename, content-type, etc.) — you never need to write those.

  • When you see an existing, already-enriched tag (e.g. from a previous list/get call), leave its inner HTML alone. Before any content_append/content_prepend/search_replace runs, it is automatically collapsed back to its minimal form (sgid, presentation, caption, and content-type for mentions) — you don't need to strip it yourself, and doing so manually is unnecessary and risks mismatched find strings.

  • Background highlights: ...

  • Text color highlights: ...

  • For both, N is 1 (yellow), 2 (amber), 3 (red), 4 (pink), 5 (purple), 6 (blue), 7 (teal), 8 (near-white), or 9 (light gray).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesName of the todo list
todoset_idYesBasecamp resource identifier
descriptionNoOptional HTML description of the todo list

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.6.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description discloses real behavioral traits: a bad person-id causes an error and writes nothing, mentions trigger notifications, bc-attachment tags are auto-enriched after saving, and existing enriched tags are collapsed before content edits. It does not cover permission requirements or the practical consequence of non-idempotent creation (duplicate lists).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The core purpose is front-loaded and the HTML rules are organized as a scannable bullet list. The block is long and dominates the definition, but nearly every bullet is necessary to produce valid content, so it is dense rather than wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a three-parameter creation tool with no output schema, the description covers purpose, ID sourcing, content formatting, and key side effects/error behavior. It leaves the return value and required permissions unspecified, which are minor gaps given how much else is documented.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is already 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds substantial meaning: it explains where todoset_id comes from and elaborates the 'description' parameter with a full HTML contract (allowed tags, paragraph spacing, lists, tables, mentions, attachments, highlights). This is well beyond what the schema conveys.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence gives a precise verb and resource ('Create a new todo list in a todo set'), which cleanly separates it from siblings like basecamp_update_todolist, basecamp_create_todo, and basecamp_create_todolist_group. It stops short of naming any sibling explicitly, so it is clear but not maximally differentiating.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides one concrete prerequisite/routing hint: fetch todoset_id from the project dock via basecamp_get_project. However, it never states when to use this versus creating a todo, a todolist group, or an update, and gives no exclusions or prerequisites beyond the ID source.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.