submit_voice_clone_to_cloud

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses idempotency, authentication requirements (auth.token in electron-store), and success response structure. However, it does not mention potential errors beyond the idempotent duplicate case (e.g., network failures, invalid cloneId).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is four concise sentences, each essential: purpose, idempotency behavior, auth and response details, and cross-reference to sibling tools for IDs and polling. Information is front-loaded and no redundant text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity and lack of output schema, the description covers all necessary aspects: what it does, idempotency, input source, auth requirement, return fields, and follow-up actions. It references related tools for cloning lifecycle, providing complete context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers the single parameter with 100% coverage. The description adds meaningful context by providing an example value ('vc_2026-05-21_abc123') and specifying the source (list_voice_clones), which goes beyond the schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('submit a local voice clone to Windy Clone for ElevenLabs training') and explicitly distinguishes from sibling tools by referencing list_voice_clones for obtaining clone IDs and get_cloud_clone_order_status for polling progress.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains idempotency ('if the clone has already been submitted...') to guide repeated invocations, and implies the tool should be used after creating a local clone. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or list alternative tools for other scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.