get_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden. It clearly states the tool is read-only and safe, and describes the exact information returned. There are no contradictions or missing behavioral details (e.g., side effects, permissions).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long, front-loading the core purpose (version info) and key details (mirrors About dialog, read-only). Every sentence earns its place with no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite lacking an output schema, the description fully explains the return values (app version, Electron, Node versions) and contextualizes it by referencing the Settings About dialog. For a simple info-getting tool, this is complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the score is baseline 4. The description correctly notes that no input is required, adding no additional semantic burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns the running Windy Word version along with Electron and Node versions, and explicitly mentions it mirrors the display in Settings → About. This is a specific verb+resource that distinguishes it from sibling tools (most of which are for settings, hardware detection, or other actions).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates the tool is 'Read-only and safe to call,' which implies it can be used anytime without side effects. While it does not explicitly list when not to use it, the simplicity of the tool (version info) makes alternatives irrelevant. It provides clear context for safe invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.