get_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Highlights that the output is 'Large' and operation is 'read-only', disclosing key behavioral traits (non-destructive, potential size) beyond the absent annotations. No mention of response format or cost, but adequate for the tool's simplicity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no redundancy, every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Complete for a 0-param, read-only tool: states return value ('full config tree'), provides usage context, and differentiates from siblings. No output schema exists, but description fills the gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All parameters (none) are fully covered by the input schema; the description adds no param info, which is appropriate per the baseline of 4 for 0-param tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb ('Return') and resource ('full electron-store config tree'), uniquely identifying the tool's action and distinguishing it from siblings like set_config.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises using this tool to discover setting paths before calling set_config, providing clear when-to-use context. Lacks explicit mention of alternatives like list_settings, but the guidance is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.