Skip to main content
Glama
sneakyfree

windy-word-mcp

by sneakyfree
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to windy-word-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Computer Control MCP

      AB498
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides computer control capabilities including mouse movements, keyboard actions, screenshot capture with OCR, and window management through a unified API.
      258 PyPI
      167
      MIT

    • computer-use-windows

      wimi321
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server for Windows desktop control, enabling screenshots, mouse and keyboard input, app launch, window/display management, and clipboard access via natural language.
      2
      MIT

    • windows-universal-mcp

      antelope1992-cmyk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for controlling Windows desktop applications through Win32 automation, enabling window listing, launching, clicking, typing, shortcuts, screenshots, and folder monitoring.
      MIT

    • MiMo Desktop MCP

      akaradje
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets an assistant observe and control Windows application windows, plus interact with Xiaomi MiMo AI Desktop workflows, through 22 tools for Unicode typing, smooth dragging, cross-window drops, and bounded SSE streaming.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 115 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Despite a large toolset at 115, most tools have detailed descriptions that clearly distinguish their specific purposes. Some potential overlap exists between settings tools (list_settings vs describe_setting vs set_setting) but descriptions clarify the differences. Overall, an agent can reliably select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_paste_strategies, get_active_paste_strategy, set_paste_strategy). No mixing of conventions like camelCase or snake_case. This predictability aids agent navigation.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 115 tools, the count is far above the typical 3-15 range for well-scoped servers. While the domain is broad (covering recording, paste, settings, voice cloning, etc.), many tools could be combined or reduced. The extreme quantity feels excessive for a single MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset is remarkably comprehensive for the Windy Word application, covering CRUD-like operations for voice clones, archives, settings, and translation memory. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct tool to retrieve the last transcript without archive search), but overall it provides a thorough surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources