quick_translate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states the action without disclosing side effects, state changes, or whether it is a read-only operation. No annotations are present, so the description must cover this but does not. For example, it does not indicate if the window is modal or if it changes focus.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that conveys the entire purpose without wasted words. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's zero parameters and no output schema, the description is largely sufficient for its simplicity. However, it could mention whether the window appears in the foreground or what triggers it, but for a basic UI action it is fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds no param info. By baseline rules (0 params = baseline 4), this is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Open the Quick Translate mini-window,' specifying a distinct verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling 'translate_text' by referring to a UI window rather than the translation operation itself. However, it lacks further detail on what the mini-window offers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'translate_text' or other translation-related tools. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context for optimal use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.