Query SignNow skill library

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, so the description's main behavioral claim (querying) aligns. It adds value by describing the two query modes and the need to load signnow101 first, which is not in annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, no wasted words. Front-loaded with purpose, then gives actionable usage instruction. Ideal conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, read-only tool with one optional param and output schema present, the description covers all needed context: listing vs. specific retrieval, and the prerequisite loading of signnow101. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a parameter description, but the tool description adds semantics: omitting skill_name lists all, providing it retrieves the skill body. This clarifies behavior beyond the schema's default/null description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool queries the SignNow skill library, with two distinct modes: listing all skills (by omitting skill_name) or retrieving a specific skill's body (by providing skill_name). This differentiates it from sibling tools that focus on documents, invites, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to load 'signnow101' before any other SignNow action, which contains required workflow rules. This provides clear usage context and a prerequisite, guiding the agent on when to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.